GOOD MORNING, Wall Street went into the long weekend with a familiar problem getting harder to ignore: the economy is still strong enough to keep the Fed hawkish, while the energy shock is still adding inflation pressure. August payrolls blew past expectations, yields jumped, stocks slipped, and then U.S.-Iran clashes escalated again on Saturday around oil tankers near the Strait of Hormuz. With U.S. markets closed Monday for Labor Day, this week’s real test is inflation: PPI Thursday, CPI Friday, and the Fed meeting just days later. MARKETS | TLDR
JOBSThe Fed Just Lost Some Room to WaitU.S. employers added 162,000 jobs in August, nearly triple the 56,000 economists surveyed by Reuters had expected. The unemployment rate held at 4.1%, while prior months were revised higher. Markets reacted immediately: Treasury yields and the dollar rose, stocks fell, and the implied probability of a 25-basis-point Fed hike at the September meeting moved to roughly 58%. The important part is not simply that hiring improved. It is that labor-market weakness had been one of the clearest arguments for the Fed to stay patient while energy-driven inflation worked through the economy. Friday’s report weakened that argument. Wage growth was still relatively contained at 3.1% year over year, but the economy now looks resilient enough that the Fed can focus more heavily on inflation without worrying that tighter policy will immediately break employment. That makes this week’s inflation data the real decision point. July CPI was already running at 3.4% year over year, and the latest rise in oil and diesel creates a fresh source of pressure. Fed Chair Kevin Warsh said at Jackson Hole that the economy had strengthened and that policymakers were waiting for more information on supply chains, investment and geopolitics before deciding whether rates should change. Friday’s jobs report supplied one half of that information. CPI supplies the other. OILThe Oil Shock Escalated Over the WeekendThe U.S.-Iran conflict moved directly back into energy markets on Saturday. U.S. Central Command said American forces struck three Iranian crude carriers after Iran fired ballistic missiles at two U.S. Navy ships. Iran said it also targeted tankers operating in the Strait of Hormuz and threatened further action. No U.S. personnel were reported injured, but the episode marked another escalation around the world’s most important oil transit route. That matters because crude was already moving higher before the weekend. Brent gained 7.6% last week to $96.28, and shipping data showed traffic through Hormuz running well below recent averages. The market does not need a full closure of the strait for the inflation problem to worsen: higher freight costs, insurance premiums, diesel prices and precautionary stockpiling can all transmit into the real economy before a major physical shortage appears. The timing is especially awkward for central banks. The Fed is less than two weeks from its September 15-16 meeting, while the ECB meets this Thursday with energy inflation already back in focus. The key caveat is that current oil prices still reflect both real supply disruption and geopolitical risk premium. But after Friday’s jobs report, the Fed has less reason to look through a renewed energy shock if it begins to show up in broader inflation data. HEADLINES
UPCOMING
DEEP INSIGTHSKevin Warsh: Keynote Remarks at Jackson HoleRead this for the Fed’s underlying framework before the September meeting. Warsh argues that the economy has become more resilient, AI-related investment is materially lifting capital spending, and policymakers are watching supply chains, geopolitics and the second-order effects of high investment before deciding whether policy needs to tighten again. That makes the speech a useful lens for interpreting both Friday’s jobs surprise and this week’s inflation data. Why the Drivers of Inflation Matter for Monetary PolicyThe ECB’s September 1 analysis makes an important distinction between the current inflation episode and 2021-22: today’s renewed inflation has so far been driven primarily by an energy supply shock rather than a broad combination of excess demand, fiscal stimulus and supply constraints. The implication is that central banks may react differently — but only as long as the energy shock does not spread into wages, expectations and broader prices. |