GOOD MORNING, Big Tech just gave investors four different answers to the same AI question. Alphabet surged after Google Cloud growth accelerated to 63%, showing that heavy infrastructure spending can translate into visible revenue. Meta went the other way after raising its capex plan without an equally dramatic growth payoff. Microsoft promised $190 billion of 2026 spending, while Amazon beat cloud expectations. The earnings story is getting stronger — just as the macro hurdle gets harder. The Fed held rates steady in its most divided vote since 1992, and Brent jumped above $118 as the Iran blockade threatened to last for months. MARKETS | TLDR
AI PAYOFFGoogle Just Gave Wall Street the AI ROI It WantedAlphabet reported first-quarter revenue of $109.9 billion, up 22% from a year earlier, while Google Cloud revenue jumped 63% to $20 billion — the fastest growth rate since Alphabet began breaking out the business in 2020. CEO Sundar Pichai said enterprise AI solutions had become Cloud's primary growth driver for the first time, with sales from those products rising eightfold. Shares climbed more than 6% after hours. That matters because Alphabet is spending aggressively too. The company raised its 2026 capex outlook to $180 billion-$190 billion as it expands data centers, networking and custom silicon. But investors were willing to accept the bigger bill because revenue acceleration was visible on the other side. Google also said it had begun selling TPU chips directly to some customers, opening another monetization channel beyond cloud rentals. Meta showed the opposite side of the same trade. The company raised its 2026 capex forecast to $125 billion-$145 billion from $115 billion-$135 billion, and shares fell more than 6% after hours. Revenue was still growing, but investors saw less evidence that the incremental spending would produce the same near-term payoff Google just demonstrated. The market is not rejecting AI capex. It is increasingly demanding proof that each extra dollar earns something. FED + OILThe Fed Held. Oil Made the Decision Harder.The Federal Reserve kept its policy rate at 3.50%-3.75%, but the vote revealed unusual disagreement. Stephen Miran wanted a 25-basis-point cut, while Beth Hammack, Neel Kashkari and Lorie Logan supported holding rates but objected to language that retained an easing bias. Four dissents made this the most divided Fed decision in more than three decades. That split matters because the inflation problem is becoming more energy-driven. Brent crude jumped 6.1% Wednesday to $118.03 a barrel after the White House confirmed President Trump had discussed ways to manage the market if the blockade of Iranian ports lasts for months. Headline inflation has already accelerated sharply since the war began, led by gasoline, even though core measures have so far been less affected. The Fed therefore has two risks moving in opposite directions. The labor market and underlying economy have shown enough softness to keep rate cuts in the conversation, while oil above $100 makes an easing bias harder to defend if energy costs begin spreading into wages, services and expectations. Powell's last meeting as chair did not resolve that tension. It exposed how divided the next Fed will be if the oil shock persists. HEADLINES
UPCOMING
DEEP INSIGTHSFederal Reserve Statement — April 29, 2026Read the primary statement for the policy tension behind the headlines. The Fed explicitly says inflation is elevated partly because of global energy prices, while the four-way dissent shows disagreement not only about the rate level but about whether the committee should still signal an easing bias. Alphabet's Record Google Cloud QuarterThis is the clearest earnings case for why investors are still willing to fund enormous AI capex. Cloud grew 63%, enterprise AI sales rose eightfold and Alphabet raised spending again — but unlike companies being punished for bigger budgets, Google showed enough incremental revenue to make the investment look productive. |